Temporary parking sign spotted near the Stanford GSB/Economics department by Michael Ostrovsky (via Google+)
Advertisements
Top Posts
- Who Gets More Pleasure From Sex?
- Jeff's Intermediate Micro Course
- Ethan Iverson on Paul Bley
- Joel Mokyr vs Bob Gordon on Technology
- Crumbs
- The Robert Parker Effect
- What is the Recommended Serving Temperature for Guinness?
- How To Open A Bag of Charcoal
- Why Does the Fastest Swimmer Anchor a Relay?
- Behavioral Economics Reading List
Tags
art
art of office politics
banana seeds
blog
books
boston
california
chicago
coffee
computers
crime
current events
decision-making
economics
education
evolution
family
financial crisis
food and wine
friends
funny
game theory
incentives
iPhone
kludge
language
law
marriage
maths
movies
music
obama
politics
psychology
publishing
sandeep has bad taste
sanitation
sport
statistics
suicide
teaching
terrorism
the web
tomatoes
travel
TV
vapor mill
war
winter
writing
Subscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- re-upping this: cheaptalk.org/2011/09/21/can… 2 months ago
- Today the Supreme Court ruled that partisan gerrymandering is not something that the judicial system can regulate.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 months ago
- “We are all just prisoners here of our own device” used to be a clever turn of phrase using a subtle form of the ve… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 8 months ago
- Wait, then how'd they get the toothpaste in there in the first place? 12 months ago
- I love you https://t.co/3Rkyir2WMU 1 year ago
Advertisements
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 15, 2012 at 7:31 am
twicker
They might want to wait on their luck next time …
October 15, 2012 at 9:25 am
Osama Rahman
But they called it right, so why wait on their luck next time?
October 15, 2012 at 8:01 am
Digitopoly | A Nobel Prize for Market Design
[…] that idea back to Lloyd Shapley and placed more weight on contributions to auctions. Stanford were nonetheless on to this yesterday. Nonetheless, the Nobel prize decided to focus on matching markets — that is, markets […]
October 15, 2012 at 8:08 am
Core Economics | A Nobel Prize for Market Design
[…] that idea back to Lloyd Shapley and placed more weight on contributions to auctions. Stanford were nonetheless on to this yesterday. Nonetheless, the Nobel prize decided to focus on matching markets — that is, markets […]
October 15, 2012 at 2:37 pm
Enrique
Ironically, parking scarcity might be a good way of testing Al Roth’s matching markets model. That is, instead of “regulation” (or a flat-out prohibition on parking), why not “auction”off parking rights to those most willing to pay for them — like the new smart meters in San Francisco?
October 16, 2012 at 1:13 am
Anonymous
Free market dies…