Temporary parking sign spotted near the Stanford GSB/Economics department by Michael Ostrovsky (via Google+)
Top Posts
- Why Does the Fastest Swimmer Anchor a Relay?
- Who Gets More Pleasure From Sex?
- Left, Right, Then Left Again
- Is It Just Your Imagination or Do All Radio Stations Play Ads at the Same Time?
- Pricing Bareback
- Who We Are
- What is the Recommended Serving Temperature for Guinness?
- If It Tastes Good It Has To Be Bad For You
- How to Shill on eBay
- Why Is It A Crime To Park Facing The Wrong Way?
Tags
art
art of office politics
banana seeds
blog
books
boston
california
chicago
coffee
computers
crime
current events
decision-making
economics
education
evolution
family
financial crisis
food and wine
friends
funny
game theory
incentives
iPhone
kludge
language
law
marriage
maths
movies
music
obama
politics
psychology
publishing
sandeep has bad taste
sanitation
sport
statistics
suicide
teaching
terrorism
the web
tomatoes
travel
TV
vapor mill
war
winter
writing
Subscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- RT @kiran_tomlinson: A warning to anyone working with the Twitter quote graph: *it's not acyclic*. The quoted tweet quotes itselfš¤Æ. This tuā¦ 15 hours ago
- Hereās to still being pre- all the events we will eventually be post- 4 days ago
- RT @emilynussbaum: Dr. Potatohead was her MOTHER. 5 days ago
- #vaccinewalkupsong In a Gadda da Vida 1 week ago
- RT @retsoor: [checks watch] still dying 1 week ago
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 15, 2012 at 7:31 am
twicker
They might want to wait on their luck next time …
October 15, 2012 at 9:25 am
Osama Rahman
But they called it right, so why wait on their luck next time?
October 15, 2012 at 8:01 am
Digitopoly | A Nobel Prize for Market Design
[…] that idea back to Lloyd Shapley and placed more weight on contributions to auctions. Stanford were nonetheless on to this yesterday. Nonetheless, the Nobel prize decided to focus on matching markets — that is, markets […]
October 15, 2012 at 8:08 am
Core Economics | A Nobel Prize for Market Design
[…] that idea back to Lloyd Shapley and placed more weight on contributions to auctions. Stanford wereĀ nonetheless on to this yesterday. Nonetheless, the Nobel prize decided to focus on matching markets — that is, markets […]
October 15, 2012 at 2:37 pm
Enrique
Ironically, parking scarcity might be a good way of testing Al Roth’s matching markets model. That is, instead of “regulation” (or a flat-out prohibition on parking), why not “auction”off parking rights to those most willing to pay for them — like the new smart meters in San Francisco?
October 16, 2012 at 1:13 am
Anonymous
Free market dies…