Temporary parking sign spotted near the Stanford GSB/Economics department by Michael Ostrovsky (via Google+)
Top Posts
- Who Gets More Pleasure From Sex?
- Pricing Bareback
- What is the Recommended Serving Temperature for Guinness?
- Why Does the Fastest Swimmer Anchor a Relay?
- Price Gouging
- Behavioral Economics Reading List
- How To Open A Bag of Charcoal
- Jeff's Intermediate Micro Course
- The Trough
- How To Improve Chat Roulette
Tags
art
art of office politics
banana seeds
blog
books
boston
california
chicago
coffee
computers
crime
current events
decision-making
economics
education
evolution
family
financial crisis
food and wine
friends
funny
game theory
incentives
iPhone
kludge
language
law
marriage
maths
movies
music
obama
politics
psychology
publishing
sandeep has bad taste
sanitation
sport
statistics
suicide
teaching
terrorism
the web
tomatoes
travel
TV
vapor mill
war
winter
writing
Subscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- RT @scottlincicome: Neily Gets Results: https://t.co/gUxbWia0fQ 2 days ago
- An un-less unless is less 3 days ago
- A Costco where the item in shortest supply is you 3 days ago
- 9 black-robed Justices deciding the meaning of words. 2 weeks ago
- RT @retsoor: a way to send the red balloon emoji w no a recipient so it just floats around the internet 2 weeks ago
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 15, 2012 at 7:31 am
twicker
They might want to wait on their luck next time …
October 15, 2012 at 9:25 am
Osama Rahman
But they called it right, so why wait on their luck next time?
October 15, 2012 at 8:01 am
Digitopoly | A Nobel Prize for Market Design
[…] that idea back to Lloyd Shapley and placed more weight on contributions to auctions. Stanford were nonetheless on to this yesterday. Nonetheless, the Nobel prize decided to focus on matching markets — that is, markets […]
October 15, 2012 at 8:08 am
Core Economics | A Nobel Prize for Market Design
[…] that idea back to Lloyd Shapley and placed more weight on contributions to auctions. Stanford were nonetheless on to this yesterday. Nonetheless, the Nobel prize decided to focus on matching markets — that is, markets […]
October 15, 2012 at 2:37 pm
Enrique
Ironically, parking scarcity might be a good way of testing Al Roth’s matching markets model. That is, instead of “regulation” (or a flat-out prohibition on parking), why not “auction”off parking rights to those most willing to pay for them — like the new smart meters in San Francisco?
October 16, 2012 at 1:13 am
Anonymous
Free market dies…