Some time ago I had half-written a post calling for a Nobel prize for Al Roth. It was after he gave his Nancy Schwartz lecture at Kellogg and I decided not to publish it because I thought maybe it was just a little too soon. Not too soon to get the prize but too soon to expect the Nobel folks to give it to him. I am glad I was wrong.
Don’t forget his very important co-authors Tayfun Sonmez, Attila Abdulkadiroglu, and Utku Unver. These guys, Tayfun especially, were still working on matching theory when nobody else was interested and before all the practical applications (mainly coming out of their collaboration with Al) started to attract attention.
This is a time for microeconomics to celebrate. When you are on a plane and you tell the person next to you that you’re an economist, they ask you about interest rates. Everyone instinctively equates economics with macroeconomics. And that’s probably because most people have the impression that macroeconomics is where economists have the biggest impact.
But actually microeconomic theory has already had a bigger impact on your life that macroeconomic theory ever will. And there’s no politics tangled up in microeconomics. When you meet a microeconomic theorist it never once occurs to you to check the saline content of their nearest body of water.
There are no fundamental disagreements about basic principles of microeconomics. And I would say that Al Roth epitomizes what’s great about microeconomics. He has no “field:” he does classical game theory/bargaining theory and he does behavioral economics. He does theory and experiments. He theorizes about market design and he actually designs markets.
Al is the second blogger to win a Nobel prize. Compare their fields and their blogs.
I never met Shapley and I only saw him give a couple talks when he was already way past his prime. But gappy3000 reminds me that he and John Nash invented a game called Fuck Your Buddy. So that’s something. And now he has a Nobel Prize. And of course without his work there would be no prize for Roth either. David Gale should have shared the prize but he died a few years ago.
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 16, 2012 at 12:40 am
Brittany
Gary Becker also has a blog but only posts at most once per week
http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/beckerposner/
October 16, 2012 at 9:03 am
jeff
yes but i think he got the prize before becoming a blogger 🙂
October 16, 2012 at 6:22 am
Michael
“There are no fundamental disagreements about basic principles of microeconomics”
I suppose this claim depend on what is a basic principle, but there seems to me to be quite a few fundamental disagreements in microeconomics. A few examples are:
George A. Akerlof
Writing the “The Market for ‘Lemons'”: A Personal and Interpretive Essay
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2001/akerlof-article.html
Liebowitz and Margolis on Network Externalities
Gul and Pesendorfer on “The Case for Mindless Economics”
Click to access mindless.pdf
Sam Bowles book which explores non-contractual social interactions, adaptive and other-regarding behaviors, and generalized increasing returns.
Click to access p7610.pdf
Geoffrey Hodgson,
‘On the Limits of Rational Choice Theory’, Economic Thought. 1(1), 2012.
Click to access limits-rational-choice.pdf
October 16, 2012 at 2:32 pm
Evan
Akerlof’s Nobel essay does not describe a fundamental disagreement in microeconomics. It is worth keeping in mind that he is describing the state of economics nearly 50 years ago, not today. He even concludes with “Lemons was much less of a break with the economics of the time than might otherwise be interpreted. It was the natural extension of the on-going intellectual activity at MIT.”
October 16, 2012 at 11:00 pm
Tayfun Sonmez
Hi Jeff,
Thanks a lot for your very generous coverage. We are very hopeful that the Roth-Shapley Nobel will increase the interest in market design.
The Nobel prize committee provided the following very thorough scientific background document for this years economics Nobel emphasizing some of the points you are making above:
Click to access advanced-economicsciences2012.pdf
Great year for us working on matching and market design and thanks for your support!
October 17, 2012 at 5:50 pm
A prize for priceless markets « Expertly Wrapped
[…] more information, see the blog entries by professors Jeff Ely in Cheap Talk and Rakesh Vohra in The Leisure on the Theory Class. Al Roth blogs at Market Design. MoreLike […]
October 20, 2012 at 1:01 pm
dan s
have you (or has anyone you know or anyone reading this) played Fuck your buddy? If so – what do you think? good game for undergrad game theory class the day before thanksgiving break? if not – i may investigate – will let you know how it goes if interested