If you are like me and you believe that thinking is better path to success than not thinking, its hard not to take it personally when an athlete or other performer who is choking is said to be “overthinking it.” He needs to get “untracked.” And if he does and reaches peak performance he is said to be “unconscious.”
There are experiments that seem to confirm the idea that too much thinking harms performance. But here’s a model in which thinking always improves performance and which is still consistent with the empirical observation that thinking is negatively correlated with performance.
In any activity we rely on two systems: one which is conscious, deliberative and requires “thinking.” The other is instinctive. Using the deliberative system always gives better results but the deliberation requires the scarce resource of our moment-to-moment attention. So for any sufficiently complex activity we have to ration the limited capacity of the deliberative system and offload many aspects of performance to pre-programmed instincts.
But for most activities we are not born with an instinctive knowledge how to do it. What we call “training” is endless rehearsal of an activity which establishes that instinct. With enough training, when circumstances demand we can offload the activity to the instinctive system in order to conserve precious deliberation for whatever novelties we are facing which truly require original thinking.
An athlete or performer who has been unsettled, unnerved, or otherwise knocked out of his rhythm finds that his instinctive system is failing him. The wind is playing tricks with his toss and so his serve is falling apart. Fortunately for him he can start focusing his attention on his toss and his serve and this will help. He will serve better as a result of overthinking his serve.
But there is no free lunch. The shock to his performance has required him to allocate more than usual of his deliberative resources to his serve and therefore he has less available for other things. He is overthinking his serve and as a result his overall performance must suffer.
(Conversation with Scott Ogawa.)
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 13, 2013 at 11:07 pm
Lones Smith
“Let me have men about me that are fat,
Sleek-headed men, and such as sleep a-nights.
Yon Cassius has a lean and hungry look.
He thinks too much. Such men are dangerous”
(Julius Caesar, Act 1, Scene 2)
October 14, 2013 at 12:38 am
Graham Peterson
I had essentially that thought when reading Kahneman’s summary of implicit and explicit thought (System 1 and System 2). Since there is a fixed caloric endowment, the brain likely solves a constrained optimization problem to maximize performance by allocating resources between the two systems.
Of course this kind of Panglossian idea about cognition doesn’t say much about how we deal with, or how to model a situation in which this “circuitry” quite literally gets “tripped up” by new circumstances. A corner solution where all resources go to deliberative thought? Then why the proverbial brain fart when we try to go from autopilot to deliberative thought due to an unanticipated exogenous shock?
December 5, 2013 at 8:19 am
tjbrlueqld@gmail.com
Hello i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anyplace, when i read this post i thought i could also make comment due to this brilliant piece of writing.
January 9, 2014 at 4:16 pm
Anonymous
There is another story explaining negative correlation between thinking and results, even if thinking is beneficial: you start thinking because the situation is unfamiliar and difficult for you.
March 9, 2014 at 6:11 pm
Despicable Me Minion Rush Hack
Normally I do not learn post on blogs, however I would like to say that
this write-up very pressured me to try and do so!
Your writing style has been surprised me.
Thank you, very great article.
March 13, 2014 at 11:11 pm
sara
I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your website.This is useful information for me.
And I want to thank you for the information.