A more appropriate name for DST is daylight consumption time. Shifting the clock re-alloates daylight from an hour when most are sleeping to an hour when almost everyone is awake. And unless our preference for daylight has a discrete jump in the Spring and the Fall, we should be smoothing out this consumption.
Apart from watches (and what is the point of wearing one of those anyway?) nearly all of our timepieces orient themselves relative to a central server. This would enable us to coordinate a smooth addition of time to our clocks, say 1 minute per day over a 60 day period.
Getting out of bed 1 minute earlier each of 60 consecutive days will dramatically reduce the total level of morning grumpiness compared to the current system where it comes in one big, grumpy, lump.
In the old days when our clocks were not synchronized this would not only have been too much of a chore, it would have caused all kinds of mis-coordination due to lack of common knowledge of the current time. (Does she worry that I worry that she forgot to add a minute?) But that problem is gone.
True, there would be a new kind of asynchrony vis-a-vis other countries where consumption of daylight isn’t valued as highly. Under the current system at least they know our local time modulo the little hand. But again, their time servers are smart enough to tell them the right time at whatever locale they are interested in.
Then of course in the fall, we smoothly adjust our clocks back.


12 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 17, 2010 at 6:03 am
Joshua Gans
Yep, I had the same thought exactly three years ago. http://gametheorist.blogspot.com/2007/03/daylight-saving-and-sleep.html
March 17, 2010 at 9:50 am
Michael Stack
My guess is that the adjustment would be too expensive. For human timekeeping the problem is pretty easy to solve. For computers, I think it’d be a lot more difficult. There is a lot of hardware & software that would have to change to accommodate a move to gradual time changes.
March 17, 2010 at 10:36 am
Noah Yetter
The implementation of this idea would produce a notable uptick in the suicide rate among IT professionals.
March 17, 2010 at 10:38 am
Greg Finley
As pointed out over at Marginal Revolution, daylight savings is much less of a pain in practice than it would be in theory.
http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2010/03/a-confession.html
I think you might be overestimating the ease of implementing 60 1-minute adjustments. And since daylight savings time really doesn’t affect us that much, it’s not worth going to the trouble of making it even more complicated.
March 17, 2010 at 11:07 am
Fred H Schlegel
Could be interesting. Although my son’s school has a centrally managed time system and they are always 3 to 6 minutes off.
March 17, 2010 at 2:20 pm
J M Rao
Are adjustment costs really convex?
When I was a kid I would get in trouble a bit and my strategy was always to get all the detention put on one Saturday so I could just get it out of the way in one shot, rather than having 15 minutes a day all year long. Clearly I did not want to smooth my free-time consumption. So I guess I had concave adjustment costs in my free-time, I really hated small changes but comparatively speaking was ok with large discrete changes.
In general, I think resistance to change reflects a cost function like my high school one. We hate change, so often do not do so when we should, but when we do, changes are big. Relationships strike me as a good example.
March 17, 2010 at 3:00 pm
jeff
good point
March 18, 2010 at 12:41 am
Nick M
I like the idea in theory, but two concerns: While all our cell phones and computers may be connected to one time server, our cars, cameras, older/more basic alarm & house clocks, etc are not. They could be, of course, but how many people want to adjust the time on their car every week or so, or want to replace a $15 alarm clock with something much more expensive just so it gets updates? (especially if those are just backups to cell phones?)
Secondly, the fall back should still be one big jump. Right now you get to enjoy an extra hour of sleep. That would be much less enjoyable over 60 days.
March 18, 2010 at 8:21 am
jeff
Totally agree on the fall back
March 18, 2010 at 7:56 am
How to Start a Home Business Business in Louisiana
[…] Daylight Consumption Smoothing « Cheap Talk […]
March 28, 2010 at 9:32 am
Daniel Reeves
I, too, had this thought when the time changed last time: http://messymatters.com/dst (though mostly I was defending DST against all my nerd friends who despise it with the intensity of a thousands suns).
March 9, 2015 at 10:30 pm
What Do Economists Say About Daylight Savings Time? | Mind Your Decisions
[…] 1. Jeff Weber at Cheap Talk […]