From a worthwhile article in the NY Times surveying a number of facts about e-book and tree-book sales:
Another reason publishers want to avoid lower e-book prices is that print booksellers like Barnes & Noble, Borders and independents across the country would be unable to compete. As more consumers buy electronic readers and become comfortable with reading digitally, if the e-books are priced much lower than the print editions, no one but the aficionados and collectors will want to buy paper books.
Which, translated, reads: publishers don’t want low e-book prices because then people would buy them. Note that according to the article, profit margins are larger for e-books than for pulp. (Confused? Marginal revenue accounts for cross-platform cannibalization, and is still set equal to marginal cost.)

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 4, 2010 at 11:04 am
Kindlefreak
sorry I am feeling extra dense this morning but would you mind explaining the last sentence in English?
March 4, 2010 at 1:16 pm
Frank
@freak.
From undergrad micro…you want the quantity of e-book sales to match the marginal effect on revenue with marginal cost.
MR on e-books = ePrice – Amazon’s cut – Pr[lost hardcover sale| ePrice] x (MR on hard sales)
MC = 0
As the ePrice falls, more hardcover sales are missed.
?
December 2, 2012 at 1:51 am
Ahmad
I actually had to start my blog as a media asnegsmint last month. But I really like it now. I know it’s a lot of hard work but do it for you! It is helping me and lets me get a lot of stuff off my chest. If you love it, keep doing it!