You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘cheap talk’ tag.

You are debating a point with a colleague. Your colleague is wrong but to prove they are wrong you have to use information you know but cannot share. So, you leave things unsaid. Of course, someone who does not know the facts would also leave things unsaid by definition.

The listener knows that silence either conveys the fact that something is known but cannot be said or that nothing is known. Their inference takes the fact that you might know something but cannot say it into account. They should give you the benefit of the doubt. The benefit depends on how likely you are to know things that cannot be said. Hence, if the person leaving things unsaid is senior to the listener, the listener might defer to the speaker. Hence, seniority leads to authority via the inference content from leaving things unsaid.

Jeff’s Twitter Feed

  • RT @retsoor: a captcha that asks you to find the face of god instead of crosswalks 1 day ago
  • RT @retsoor: a ghost that only appears walking across a captcha crosswalk 1 day ago
  • A vaccine with its own human to human transmission 2 days ago
  • RT @JakeCordell: On the left, Russia's state-run TASS news agency's home page. On the right, Russia's state-run TASS news agency's commerci… 3 days ago
  • After today Russia has lost any legitimacy to criticize deficiencies in American democratic institutions. 3 days ago

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,149 other followers