Free as in liberated. Here’s the opening paragraph:
I wrote this paper with the recognition that it is unlikely to be accepted for publication. There is something liberating about writing a paper without trying to please referees and without having to take into consideration the various protocols and conventions imposed on researchers in experimental economics (see Rubinstein (2001)). It gives one a feeling of real academic freedom!
The paper reports on long-running experiments relating response times to mistakes in decision-making.
Cheap Talk 
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 28, 2013 at 2:20 pm
Enrique
Rubinstein violated his own 15-page (double-spaced) rule!
June 10, 2013 at 3:51 pm
Ardiansyah
I savor, lead to I found just what I used to be looking for. You have ended my four day lehngty hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye
June 10, 2013 at 11:04 pm
sqeuum
EVBjfc fgvtbxyfqfsr
October 17, 2013 at 8:15 pm
Carlos
I wanted to cmpsooe you the tiny note so as to say thank you the moment again just for the lovely tactics you have documented at this time. It has been simply open-handed of you to grant unreservedly precisely what most people would have distributed as an ebook to generate some profit for their own end, mostly considering the fact that you might have tried it in case you considered necessary. These techniques likewise acted to become a great way to realize that most people have similar dream similar to mine to find out more and more with regard to this condition. Certainly there are many more pleasant times up front for many who read carefully your blog post.
March 3, 2014 at 10:32 pm
Ally
QuotesChimp can take years to receive benefits. When a wounded man seeks harms under the fault system, he or she must regularly go through years of waiting to receive harms due to the time consuming exercise of bringing a legal case and waiting for a court date (assuming a swift resolution can’t be reached with the underwriter of the man at fault). Sadly, statement collectors, like the tides, wait for no guy. Therefore, several have been fiscally destroied while waiting to collect their cash.
January 29, 2013 at 12:39 am
Lones Smith
Love the last comment! 🙂
If exploring the time to decide is new, I think this is an important and God-forbid “useful” result that really rings true. Regardless of whether it is “cleanly” done or not, shouldn’t our profession be focused a little more on rough and ready useful novelty, and a little less on excellent execution of less novel papers that tips its hat to the gate-keepers. I hope I am not mis-characterizing, but I really think that this was the style of Stiglitz that brought him boatloads of fame and glory.
I am a theorist, but I think I’ll post this now on my electronic course site.