We have been blogging for two years now. When we turned 1 I started writing a sequence of posts on Why I Blog. Here’s a few of them. As a final why-thought I would like to say that while blogging often feels like shirking, in fact the number one reason that keeps me going when I start to worry I am running out of ideas is that this blog has proved to be a huge boon to my research.
Sandeep and I started writing Torture on this blog. Simply put, that paper would not exist if Cheap Talk did not exist. This post I wrote recently about overbooking set me thinking for a day or two and now, with ideas from Daniel Garrett and Toomas Hinnosaar, the three of us are writing a paper on it. These are the concrete products but there are many more benefits that are harder to measure but easily as important.
First, if you look at the tag vapor mill, you will find a trail of ideas that I have written down, each of which has the potential to be a real research project. A number of them I intend to work on when I have the time. Second, its a true cliche that writing about “the real world” makes you a better theorist. Sometimes you learn that crucial assumptions are too restrictive to explain a story. Sometimes you find a new appreciation of just how far they go. And not even the most prolific “applied theorists” get the opportunity to write as frequently and about the kind of wide-interest topics as a blogger gets.
Done with the why, onto the how. Blogging is a big commitment and you learn only very slowly how to do it efficiently. Given the amount of time I spend staring at a blank text editor I still have a lot to learn myself. But I’ll write a few things I picked up. For starters let me tell you how Sandeep and I started this blog because I think we did something smart that I would recommend to anybody who was thinking about jumping in.
We blogged to ourselves for about a month. It was a a real dress rehearsal: we used the WordPress blog that we are using now, we wrote posts about once a day, but nobody read them because nobody knew the blog existed. This was mainly to see what it would be like to try to write on a daily basis. If it looked like we wouldn’t be able to keep it going we would just call it off and nobody would know we were failures.
But when we finally decided that it was a go, it had a second benefit. Before going public, we archived all of the posts we had written already and scheduled them to be published a day at a time over the next several weeks. Here’s why this is such a great idea. Blogging requires momentum. Unless you are a highly unusual person, it is impossible to conjure up something to write about on a daily basis. Instead, what you do is collect ideas, allow them to percolate around in your head for awhile and then write them down when they are ripe. It takes months before there’s enough in the pipeline to keep you actively writing. Having a headstart gives you the lead time you need to reach that cruising speed.
(Drawing: Riding The Wave from www.f1me.net)
11 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 2, 2011 at 3:49 am
michael webster
What would you do to improve the quality of the comments and threads?
February 2, 2011 at 2:57 pm
jeff
i think we have good commenters, i wouldn’t want to do anything to upset that balance.
i do appreciate comments and i sometimes try to write posts in a way that will provoke more commenting. but i don’t seem to have a good feel for what gets people motivated to contribute their 6 dollars and 2 cents.
February 2, 2011 at 5:46 am
twicker
Jeff & Sandeep:
Thanks for starting this experiment, and for keeping it up – very interesting stuff, and good to think about. Really appreciate it.
February 2, 2011 at 3:01 pm
jeff
thanks for reading and commenting.
February 2, 2011 at 7:04 am
Rajiv Sethi
Jeff, two comments. The quality of a blog (and even its long run viability and success) are not closely tied to the frequency of posting. There’s room in the blogging ecosystem for the blog with infrequent but high quality posts – interfluidity and macroeconomic resilience are great examples. Second, one great virtue of you blog is the research ideas that it throws out for others (especially grad students scattered across the world) to develop, even if you and Sandeep have neither the time nor inclination to do so. This is not shirking by any stretch of the imagination. On the other, reading too many blogs can be a form of shirking. I read all your posts and its mostly for the pleasure of it.
February 2, 2011 at 3:01 pm
jeff
thanks rajiv. i would appreciate being a shirking destination just as much.
February 2, 2011 at 2:08 pm
dan
what have you substituted your time away from – ie what do you spend less time on now than you did in pre-blog life
February 2, 2011 at 3:00 pm
jeff
i sleep a little less, i watch almost no tv (whereas i watched a tiny bit before), i do read fewer books.
also total neglect of my wife and kids frees up a lot of time.
February 3, 2011 at 1:24 pm
jeff
and always remember the other margin: you can do just as much stuff as before and just do everything worse.
February 3, 2011 at 7:19 am
Anonymous
Jeff & Sandeep,
Great work! Keep it up, love reading this blog.
February 3, 2011 at 12:16 pm
dan
neglecting wife/kids is added perk (for them) but i’m sure you were doing that already 🙂
i ask because i get the sense from what you write that you’re encouraging others to blog but it’s not clear that more bloggers is always better.. it seems obvious actually that the optimal number of bloggers != everyone. but it’s not obvious why not (and whetehr the mkt outcome = social opt)