I would think that is exactly the purpose of minimum parking requirements, especially in suburbs. Take as given that residents will resist the installation of parking meters on their streets or other parking restrictions. Then parking spaces in strip malls have positive externalities for homeowners because they reduce spillover parking in the neighborhoods. The privately optimal number of parking spaces is therefore too low and mandatory minimums are aimed at correcting that. The question we are interested in is whether mandatory minimums increase parking space beyond what is socially optimal.
- Why Is It A Crime To Park Facing The Wrong Way?
- What is the Recommended Serving Temperature for Guinness?
- Why Exams Should be Open Book
- Pricing Bareback
- How To Open A Bag of Charcoal
- The Adult Safety Break
- How to Shill on eBay
- Left, Right, Then Left Again
- Why Does the Fastest Swimmer Anchor a Relay?
- Organs for Money
art art of office politics banana seeds blog books boston california chicago coffee computers crime current events decision-making economics education evolution family financial crisis food and wine friends funny game theory incentives iPhone kludge language law marriage maths movies music obama politics psychology publishing sandeep has bad taste sanitation sport statistics suicide teaching terrorism the web tomatoes travel TV vapor mill war winter writing
- If you're not using those superdelegates can we have them? -- GOP 1 day ago
- Caveat whatever-the-Latin-word-for-reader-is. 1 day ago
- There is no scarcity of rope. Donald Trump Threatens the Ghostwriter of “The Art of the Deal” newyorker.com/news/news-desk… via @newyorker 2 days ago
- RT @stuartpstevens: Somebody should think about starting a party that values individual liberty and collective purpose. Might be a market f… 2 days ago
- RT @HickmanPolls: Trump's speech appears to have resonated with his target audience. twitter.com/drdavidduke/st… 3 days ago