When cellphone use is allowed on planes (e.g. on foreign airlines), people get on the phone. But passengers seem to want airlines to ban use. How are these things consistent? Some simple theories:
1. Negative externality 1: You can’t control who calls you, e.g. your boss giving you yet more work. If cellphone use is not allowed, no-one can call you.
2. Behavioral Economics story: You have a self-control problem. You know you’ll use the phone excessively as you’re a phone addict. Banning use helps you commit not to use it.
3. Prisoner’s Dilemma (Negative Externality 2): You want to use your phone on a flight but you don’t want your neighbour to use it. But this is not possible so you know everyone will use their phone. Then, you prefer that no-one be allowed to use a cellphone on flight, even if it prevents you from using your phone. A possible solution: Some of the revenue generated can be returned to the passengers to compensate them for the externality they suffer. Only way this will happen is if it gives one airline a competitive advantage over another.
Of course, with airlines in financial trouble, selling snacks on planes, Wi-Fi is coming somewhere to a plane near you whether you like it or not as someone will pay for it as they like it.
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 29, 2009 at 8:41 am
A N Other
Isn’t it true that I can have individual preferences (I want to use my phone) and societal preferences (I don’t think it is a good thing for society to let people use phones on a plane) which are indeed different and, in this case, opposing?
This doesn’t really fit into any of your categories though.
October 1, 2009 at 11:22 am
ilkka
It seems unavoidable that the profits from cell phone calls are used to lower airfare for all. It’s a competetive business, so supernormal profits shouldn’t be possible. All that is required is for the cell phone calls to be priced above marginal cost, but given that it is a natural monopoly for the airline, it seems obvious that this will be the case.