For the game theorists in the room, the difference must boil down to whether we have random matching across populations (case 1) or within a single population (case 2.)
Top Posts
- The Overtime Spike in NBA Basketball
- How To Open A Bag of Charcoal
- Why Does the Fastest Swimmer Anchor a Relay?
- Pricing Bareback
- Countersignaling and 4'33''
- Who We Are
- The Trough
- If It Tastes Good It Has To Be Bad For You
- Why Is It A Crime To Park Facing The Wrong Way?
- What is the Recommended Serving Temperature for Guinness?
Tags
art art of office politics banana seeds blog books boston california chicago coffee computers crime current events decision-making economics education evolution family financial crisis food and wine friends funny game theory incentives iPhone kludge language law marriage maths movies music obama politics psychology publishing sandeep has bad taste sanitation sport statistics suicide teaching terrorism the web tomatoes travel TV vapor mill war winter writingSubscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- the tennis court you play on progressively shrinks from regular to pickle-ball to "touch" tennis to a tiny square t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
- RT @prawn_meat: peter rabbit makes me sick. those are mr mcgregor's radishes you little fuck 2 weeks ago
- Simple way to eliminate the incentive to foul at the end of basketball games: on a non-shooting foul a team that i… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 weeks ago
- Not paying attention @adikuva twitter.com/VSET_contact/s… https://t.co/ufWZl1xhio 3 weeks ago
- RT @VSET_contact: 13/13 It's a wrap. Please enjoy this view from our hotel... https://t.co/V8Y3udZfak 4 weeks ago
Join 2,151 other subscribers
Leave a comment
Comments feed for this article