Most of us define ourselves by the ways we differ from others. More accurately, by the ways we think we differ from others. A lot of the time we are just wrong about ourselves and especially about how we compare with others.
Here is a good test of how well-calibrated is your self-perception. Do you like your friends’ friends? Since your friends like you (presumably) and also like their other friends, it follows that you are likely to be more similar to your friends’ friends than you are to your friends. And so how you feel about them says a lot about how you really feel about yourself, and its often different than how you tell yourself you feel about yourself.
(This trick doesn’t work for SO’s SO. Because your SO’s past SO is likely to be very different from you since she learned from her mistake. And if its your SO’s current (other) SO, then for obvious reasons you are probably not able to make a levelheaded judgment about whether you like him.)
It has some surprising implications. If you are someone who tends to feel superior to others, then you should like your friends’ friends, in fact you should on average feel inferior to them. If you don’t then you are mistaken about your superiority, at least according to the standard you apply. And if you are someone who tends to feel inferior, and you find that you like your friends’ friends, then you are probably not as bad as you think.
Now tell me what it means when your friends’ friends don’t like you.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 4, 2009 at 6:56 pm
Profiling « Cheap Talk
[…] by jeff If somebody looks better from the side than the front it is a good sign that they have a poorly calibrated self-image. Mirrors make it easy to manipulate the way we look from the front but it’s much harder to […]
March 18, 2009 at 8:52 am
Michael Bishop
“you are likely to be more similar to your friends’ friends than you are to your friends”
I don’t know if I buy it. Know of any empirical work on the question?
If friendship is symmetric, and more likely the more similar two people are along several dimensions, it seems more likely that we will be like our friends than our friends’ friends?
I’d love it if you could convince me otherwise.
March 20, 2009 at 11:59 pm
jeff
just to give you an example of how the effect would appear, suppose you like people with blue eyes and your friend likes people with brown eyes. then you have brown eyes and so do your friends’ friends, but your friend has blue eyes.
March 18, 2009 at 10:05 am
brainwarped
wow. I want to read more from Jeff.
April 3, 2009 at 10:43 pm
Tam
I think the argument works well if the friend only has a single trait that attracts all his/her friends. But in reality, a person has many different traits, each appeals to his/her different friends.
For example, your friend has blue eyes and red hair. You strongly like people with blue eyes, but slightly hate redheads. Your friend’s friend, on the other hand, slightly hate people with blue eyes but fervently love people with red hair. You and your friend’s friend don’t have much in common in this case.
May 21, 2009 at 9:15 pm
Your Co-Authors’ Co-Authors « Cheap Talk
[…] 21, 2009 in Uncategorized | Tags: friends, vapor mill | by jeff OK so I am apparently obsessed with this theme, but I guess that is what makes me a […]