Something to revisit when the fiscal cliff negotiations make you mad.
Advertisements
Top Posts
- Who Gets More Pleasure From Sex?
- How To Open A Bag of Charcoal
- What is the Recommended Serving Temperature for Guinness?
- Ethan Iverson on Paul Bley
- Joel Mokyr vs Bob Gordon on Technology
- Why Is It A Crime To Park Facing The Wrong Way?
- Jeff's Intermediate Micro Course
- Popularize: The Myerson-Satterthwaite Theorem
- The Robert Parker Effect
- Is It Just Your Imagination or Do All Radio Stations Play Ads at the Same Time?
Tags
art
art of office politics
banana seeds
blog
books
boston
california
chicago
coffee
computers
crime
current events
decision-making
economics
education
evolution
family
financial crisis
food and wine
friends
funny
game theory
incentives
iPhone
kludge
language
law
marriage
maths
movies
music
obama
politics
psychology
publishing
sandeep has bad taste
sanitation
sport
statistics
suicide
teaching
terrorism
the web
tomatoes
travel
TV
vapor mill
war
winter
writing
Subscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- re-upping this: cheaptalk.org/2011/09/21/can… 2 months ago
- Today the Supreme Court ruled that partisan gerrymandering is not something that the judicial system can regulate.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 months ago
- “We are all just prisoners here of our own device” used to be a clever turn of phrase using a subtle form of the ve… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 8 months ago
- Wait, then how'd they get the toothpaste in there in the first place? 12 months ago
- I love you https://t.co/3Rkyir2WMU 1 year ago
Advertisements
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 8, 2012 at 8:35 pm
jeff
I like Jon Stewart and I think Fox News is a joke but I was watching this live when it happened and I think it was actually solid journalism. Karl Rove had a legitimate question and they went and answered it. And when he got the answer he basically said ok, if you say so.
I learned why Ohio was called only because the question was raised and they were genuinely interested in the answer. So i don’t see why this is fodder for Jon Stewart.
November 8, 2012 at 9:47 pm
Bernardo
Jeff, lets not intellectualize this. The whole clip is priceless. Every 5 seconds a gem pops out.
November 8, 2012 at 11:42 pm
Lones Smith
Actually, I believe that the best Stewart clip ever, which I have posted for my Pigouvian taxes part of my PhD micro, is “Crash for Clunkers”: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-november-11-2009/crash-for-clunkers
November 9, 2012 at 8:40 am
Sandeep Baliga
This is great. I like the Seinfeld double dipping episode for externalities.
November 9, 2012 at 7:46 am
Sandeep Baliga
I didn’t watch it live so I was saw it with some hindsight bias. E.g. behind the scenes Rove was in contact with the Romney campaign who did wanted Ohio NOT to be called (http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/11/how-rove-fought-with-fox-over-ohio.html). He tried to do their bidding. Rove had to know that when the networks unanimously call a state early the evidence has to be super solid. So, he knows he’s just causing trouble. The Fox News desk should also trust their stats guys over Rove plus they should also know everyone else has called OH for Obama. But they are caught up in their own spin and don’t just relay the stats desk response to Rove. Megyn Kelly’s phrase about “using math to make yourself feel better” is right on the spot and I think the Fox news stats guys come out of this very well. Megyn Kelly walks back to the grungy back office – also great TV. So, I think it is both riveting and fodder for Jon Stewart. Here’s anotrher account: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/roves-on-air-rebuttal-of-foxs-ohio-vote-call-raises-questions-about-his-role.html