I wrote about it here. I had a look at the video and it was the right call given the rule, but as I argued in the original post the rule is an unnecessary kludge. At best, it does nothing (in equilibrium.)
Top Posts
- Is It Just Your Imagination or Do All Radio Stations Play Ads at the Same Time?
- How To Open A Bag of Charcoal
- Why Is It A Crime To Park Facing The Wrong Way?
- Coke For A Nickel
- Jeff's Intermediate Micro Course
- Why Are Asian Desserts So Bad?
- The Overtime Spike in NBA Basketball
- Game Theory of Poker
- Behavioral Economics Reading List
- Blogging Something I Know Nothing About
Tags
art art of office politics banana seeds blog books boston california chicago coffee computers crime current events decision-making economics education evolution family financial crisis food and wine friends funny game theory incentives iPhone kludge language law marriage maths movies music obama politics psychology publishing sandeep has bad taste sanitation sport statistics suicide teaching terrorism the web tomatoes travel TV vapor mill war winter writingSubscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- RT @Mylovanov: KSE graduates die defending Ukraine. Now Denys Antipov. It is easy to get used to this news. But this is not normal and shou… 3 hours ago
- RT @Mylovanov: This me in Kyiv at the Kyiv School of Economics. After giving a talk yesterday to prospective students. We teach, we do rese… 9 hours ago
- Chekhov blows. 1 day ago
- ewoks -> wokes so there. 1 week ago
- RT @Mylovanov: We Ukrainians have proven to the world that we are a coherent nation, distinct from Russia, we will ferociously fight for ou… 1 week ago
Cheap Talk 
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 6, 2012 at 8:56 am
Anonymous
You are alone on that opinion. Not only is that a difficult catch for an infielder but the rule states that the call must be made immediately not as the ball is about to hit the ground.
October 6, 2012 at 9:15 am
Anonymous
Per Buster Olney:
In the past 3 seasons, there were six infield flies not caught, the longest at 178 feet. Friday’s infield fly was measured at 225 feet.
October 6, 2012 at 4:53 pm
Turing Test
Except that the ball fell in the outfield, not the infield
October 6, 2012 at 5:03 pm
Roger
To clear up some misconceptions about the rule:
a) An “infield fly” does not necessarily have to be in the infield. “An INFIELD FLY is a fair fly ball (not including a line drive nor an attempted bunt) which can be caught by an infielder with ordinary effort…”
b) The umpire was perfectly within his rights to call an infield fly at that point. It does not need to be called immediately, it needs to be called immediately AFTER it has become apparent that it can be caught with ordinary effort. “When it seems apparent that a batted ball will be an Infield Fly, the umpire shall immediately declare Infield Fly for the benefit of the runners.”
The umpire made the right call, at at least a right call. It may not have clearly been an “ordinary effort” catch, but it was close enough that it’s all a judgement call.
October 7, 2012 at 9:04 pm
Donald A. Coffin
This is actually a comment on your May 15, 2009, post. In which you got two things wrong (one of which one commenter then corrected). The second was your proposal that the batter, on an extremely high pop fly, should pass the runner who is holding on first base. But this, too, is wrong, In this case, the batter would be out for having passed a baserunner [Rule 7.08 (h)] ahead of him.