I wrote about it here. I had a look at the video and it was the right call given the rule, but as I argued in the original post the rule is an unnecessary kludge. At best, it does nothing (in equilibrium.)
Top Posts
- Airlines Exploit The (Peter) Diamond Paradox?
- Why Is It A Crime To Park Facing The Wrong Way?
- Jeff's Intermediate Micro Course
- Is It Just Your Imagination or Do All Radio Stations Play Ads at the Same Time?
- Popularize: The Myerson-Satterthwaite Theorem
- Why Does the Fastest Swimmer Anchor a Relay?
- Behavioral Economics Reading List
- Ethan Iverson on Paul Bley
- If It Tastes Good It Has To Be Bad For You
- What is the Recommended Serving Temperature for Guinness?
Tags
art
art of office politics
banana seeds
blog
books
boston
california
chicago
coffee
computers
crime
current events
decision-making
economics
education
evolution
family
financial crisis
food and wine
friends
funny
game theory
incentives
iPhone
kludge
language
law
marriage
maths
movies
music
obama
politics
psychology
publishing
sandeep has bad taste
sanitation
sport
statistics
suicide
teaching
terrorism
the web
tomatoes
travel
TV
vapor mill
war
winter
writing
Subscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- re-upping this: cheaptalk.org/2011/09/21/can… 4 months ago
- Today the Supreme Court ruled that partisan gerrymandering is not something that the judicial system can regulate.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 months ago
- “We are all just prisoners here of our own device” used to be a clever turn of phrase using a subtle form of the ve… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 10 months ago
- Wait, then how'd they get the toothpaste in there in the first place? 1 year ago
- I love you https://t.co/3Rkyir2WMU 1 year ago
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 6, 2012 at 8:56 am
Anonymous
You are alone on that opinion. Not only is that a difficult catch for an infielder but the rule states that the call must be made immediately not as the ball is about to hit the ground.
October 6, 2012 at 9:15 am
Anonymous
Per Buster Olney:
In the past 3 seasons, there were six infield flies not caught, the longest at 178 feet. Friday’s infield fly was measured at 225 feet.
October 6, 2012 at 4:53 pm
Turing Test
Except that the ball fell in the outfield, not the infield
October 6, 2012 at 5:03 pm
Roger
To clear up some misconceptions about the rule:
a) An “infield fly” does not necessarily have to be in the infield. “An INFIELD FLY is a fair fly ball (not including a line drive nor an attempted bunt) which can be caught by an infielder with ordinary effort…”
b) The umpire was perfectly within his rights to call an infield fly at that point. It does not need to be called immediately, it needs to be called immediately AFTER it has become apparent that it can be caught with ordinary effort. “When it seems apparent that a batted ball will be an Infield Fly, the umpire shall immediately declare Infield Fly for the benefit of the runners.”
The umpire made the right call, at at least a right call. It may not have clearly been an “ordinary effort” catch, but it was close enough that it’s all a judgement call.
October 7, 2012 at 9:04 pm
Donald A. Coffin
This is actually a comment on your May 15, 2009, post. In which you got two things wrong (one of which one commenter then corrected). The second was your proposal that the batter, on an extremely high pop fly, should pass the runner who is holding on first base. But this, too, is wrong, In this case, the batter would be out for having passed a baserunner [Rule 7.08 (h)] ahead of him.