The politics of not funding Political Science:
By a vote of 218-208, the House Wednesday night backed an amendment that would bar the NSF from spending any of its 2013 funds on its political science program, which allocated about $11 million in peer-reviewed grants this year. Explaining the amendment on the House floor Wednesday evening, Flake said that given his colleagues’ reluctance to slash the agency’s overall budget — the House defeated his earlier amendment by a vote of 291 to 121 — Congress should ensure, “at the least, that the NSF does not waste taxpayer dollars on a meritless program.”
In hunting for programs that the government should not spend its precious dollars on, Flake said, “I can think of few finer examples to cut than the National Science Foundation’s Political Science Program.”
Here’s a list of apparently less fine examples that will live on:
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 15, 2012 at 1:00 am
Anonymous
They modeled it…sigh
http://voteview.com/blog/?p=490
May 22, 2012 at 9:24 pm
José Antonio Espín Sánchez
That’s not model, just a meaningless regression… I wonder why they did not get the money…
May 15, 2012 at 12:52 pm
Dan Bernhardt
Save additional funds by ceasing to pay salaries to Representatives whose actions reveal that they are brain dead?