Top Posts
- Is It Just Your Imagination or Do All Radio Stations Play Ads at the Same Time?
- Coke For A Nickel
- Three Game Theorists Walk Into A (Common Value) Bar
- Why Is It A Crime To Park Facing The Wrong Way?
- Pricing Bareback
- Obsessively Checking Email, Feel Free To Profit From This Idea
- More Guns, Less Crime, More Violence Conditional on Crime
- Left, Right, Then Left Again
- Organs for Money
- Ariel Rubinstein's Didactic Game Theory Site
Tags
art art of office politics banana seeds blog books boston california chicago coffee computers crime current events decision-making economics education evolution family financial crisis food and wine friends funny game theory incentives iPhone kludge language law marriage maths movies music obama politics psychology publishing sandeep has bad taste sanitation sport statistics suicide teaching terrorism the web tomatoes travel TV vapor mill war winter writingSubscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- RT @ethan_iverson: I think I will be stealing this idea outright from Sam when teaching 5 days ago
- THE COLOR OF MONEY = Friends twitter.com/ethan_iverson/… 1 week ago
- RT @Mylovanov: KSE graduates die defending Ukraine. Now Denys Antipov. It is easy to get used to this news. But this is not normal and shou… 1 week ago
- RT @Mylovanov: This me in Kyiv at the Kyiv School of Economics. After giving a talk yesterday to prospective students. We teach, we do rese… 1 week ago
- Chekhov blows. 1 week ago
Cheap Talk 
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
November 14, 2012 at 10:44 pm
Nageeb
Item 6 is terrific: while the field / natural experiments on the impact of social pressure on turnout choices are compelling, none of it as evocative as the image of an angry voter running over her spouse. These images should make their way into some turnout lecture slides, perhaps labeled as “very very behavioral political economy.”