Top Posts
Tags
art art of office politics banana seeds blog books boston california chicago coffee computers crime current events decision-making economics education evolution family financial crisis food and wine friends funny game theory incentives iPhone kludge language law marriage maths movies music obama politics psychology publishing sandeep has bad taste sanitation sport statistics suicide teaching terrorism the web tomatoes travel TV vapor mill war winter writingSubscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- RT @heatherchristle: What I like about the word "upon" is how it hints at an act of placement and feels light in its work of arrangement, w… 1 day ago
- RT @page_eco: It’s getting real! I can unveil the cover of “Optimally Irrational”. 👇 Available before the end of the year at @CambridgeUP.… 1 week ago
- pronouns: (n+1st)-person (mod 3) 1 week ago
- RT @matt_levine: i wonder what percentage of m&a activity is driven by people trying to avoid spending time with their children https://t.c… 1 week ago
- RT @Mylovanov: Ukraine can win this war. We will win this war. Don’t doubt us. Don’t be constantly surprised. Support us and believe in us.… 2 weeks ago
Join 2,153 other followers
Cheap Talk 
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
November 14, 2012 at 10:44 pm
Nageeb
Item 6 is terrific: while the field / natural experiments on the impact of social pressure on turnout choices are compelling, none of it as evocative as the image of an angry voter running over her spouse. These images should make their way into some turnout lecture slides, perhaps labeled as “very very behavioral political economy.”