Top Posts
- Who Gets More Pleasure From Sex?
- How To Open A Bag of Charcoal
- Left, Right, Then Left Again
- Jeff's Intermediate Micro Course
- Is It Just Your Imagination or Do All Radio Stations Play Ads at the Same Time?
- Pricing Bareback
- Snakes and Mushrooms
- Less Than a Decade Later, the Microsoft Case is Irrelevant
- Golden Balls Solved?
- Prisoner's Dilemma Everywhere: Amazon Source
Tags
art
art of office politics
banana seeds
blog
books
boston
california
chicago
coffee
computers
crime
current events
decision-making
economics
education
evolution
family
financial crisis
food and wine
friends
funny
game theory
incentives
iPhone
kludge
language
law
marriage
maths
movies
music
obama
politics
psychology
publishing
sandeep has bad taste
sanitation
sport
statistics
suicide
teaching
terrorism
the web
tomatoes
travel
TV
vapor mill
war
winter
writing
Subscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- RT @retsoor: a zoom background that reveals the ghouls & demons that constantly hover around you unseen 1 day ago
- Whatever doesn’t kill me only makes my hair longer. 1 day ago
- 🎶 Please please please Let me let me let me still want what I wanted and then got This time… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 days ago
- breyer, roberts, sotomayor, kagan, gorsuch, kavanaugh 6 days ago
- RT @retsoor: a notification that dings on all of our phones when the amount of things that have happened is exactly equal to the amount of… 1 week ago
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
November 14, 2012 at 10:44 pm
Nageeb
Item 6 is terrific: while the field / natural experiments on the impact of social pressure on turnout choices are compelling, none of it as evocative as the image of an angry voter running over her spouse. These images should make their way into some turnout lecture slides, perhaps labeled as “very very behavioral political economy.”