Top Posts
- How To Open A Bag of Charcoal
- What is the Recommended Serving Temperature for Guinness?
- Left, Right, Then Left Again
- Pricing Bareback
- If It Tastes Good It Has To Be Bad For You
- Why Does the Fastest Swimmer Anchor a Relay?
- Is It Just Your Imagination or Do All Radio Stations Play Ads at the Same Time?
- The Overtime Spike in NBA Basketball
- Why Are Asian Desserts So Bad?
- The Goethe Auction
Tags
art
art of office politics
banana seeds
blog
books
boston
california
chicago
coffee
computers
crime
current events
decision-making
economics
education
evolution
family
financial crisis
food and wine
friends
funny
game theory
incentives
iPhone
kludge
language
law
marriage
maths
movies
music
obama
politics
psychology
publishing
sandeep has bad taste
sanitation
sport
statistics
suicide
teaching
terrorism
the web
tomatoes
travel
TV
vapor mill
war
winter
writing
Subscribe via RSS
Jeff’s Twitter Feed
- RT @ethan_iverson: NEW for @thenation: I weigh in on A LOVE SUPREME, the greatest long-form composition of American Classical Music https:/… 2 days ago
- RT @retsoor: an alternate universe where everyone but mike is magic 2 days ago
- TFW you open the Uber app and you’re prompted to tip/rate your last driver bit you can’t remember if she earned it… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 days ago
- He’s good twitter.com/NUEconomics/st… 5 days ago
- microdying 5 days ago
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
November 14, 2012 at 10:44 pm
Nageeb
Item 6 is terrific: while the field / natural experiments on the impact of social pressure on turnout choices are compelling, none of it as evocative as the image of an angry voter running over her spouse. These images should make their way into some turnout lecture slides, perhaps labeled as “very very behavioral political economy.”