I am attending an antitrust conference hosted by the Searle Center at Northwestern University. In my attempt to Americanize, I am drawn to any paper involving sport. And if British sport is thrown in for comparison, resistance is impossible.
Haddock, Jacobi and Sag offer an analysis of American NFL football stadiums versus English soccer stadiums. Their thesis is simple: the NFL controls entry of new teams in the league and teams can move from one city to another. So, if the New Jersey government does not cough up $1 billion for the New Meadowlands, teams can threaten to move and the NFL can refuse to allocate another team to the state. For example:
When the Houston Oilers threatened to move to Jacksonville, Florida in 1987 Harris County, Texas, responded with $67 million in improvements to the funded by property tax increases, doubling the county’s hotel tax, and underwriting bonds to be paid over the next 30 years. Within six years the Oilers began lobbying for a new stadium with club seating. Rather than opposing the Oilers rent seeking, NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue warned Houston that “If the Oilers’ situation doesn’t work down there, I don’t see any circumstances in which we’re going to guarantee a team, especially when one team’s already found it unsatisfactory.” The message was clear, if Houston lost the Oilers because it refused to accede to the team’s demands, it was unlikely to receive a prompt replacement. At the end of the 1996 season the Oilers left Houston for Nashville where city officials had promised to contribute $144 million toward a new stadium.
In England, entry is easy. If a team attempts to hold up a city, it can create its own new team. This reduces the bargaining power of the team.
Jerry Hausman, the discussant, found much to disagree with. Hausman claimed many British teams were simply no-hopers. Very few teams are actually competitive. Arsenal is not one of them and hence no-one would fund a stadium for them. In the NFL, many teams are competitive. Hence, they can extract rents from the local community. He thought politics was an the center of problem: Why did Massachusetts fund a new high school in Newton rather than soend money in poorer areas? He displayed a surprising amount of knowledge about English soccer and claimed to have worked for the Chicago Bulls (I didn’t catch what he did for them). He speaks fast so I may have missed some details.
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 23, 2011 at 1:17 pm
Anonymous
This is an interesting thought. I don’t follow the analogy with English soccer though. Since when did Arsenal become a “no-hoper”? They won at least two titles in the ’90s.
September 23, 2011 at 2:17 pm
jonm
Jerry Hausman is full of it. Forbes recently ranked Arsenal as the seventh most valuable sports team behind two MLB teams, two NFL teams, and two other soccer teams.
The original authors are spot on. The membership of the top European leagues is not fixed, so there is a market of 50+ potentially (not actually) competitive teams in each country. Indeed if Arsenal and Chelsea were to leave London (for where? Southampton? Berlin?), there would be no need for any authority to start a team; secondary clubs like Tottenham and West Ham would benefit from increased crowds, publicity and investment and take their place. In the US each league is a monopoly in its own sport.
September 24, 2011 at 9:21 pm
Enda H
I agree with the other two comments.
1) Arsenal are competitive. They’re crap this season, but they won two league titles in the 2000s and were runners-up another two or three times. They went one season undefeated which was unprecedented. They also won three FA Cups and got to the final of the Champions’ League.
2) English football clubs don’t move. See what happened to Wimbledon.
September 25, 2011 at 8:39 pm
nus
Arsenal are no-hopers this season, but not when the stadium was being built http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenal_F.C.#Domestic
I don’t know how many American Football teams New Jersey has, but London has four football (what y’all are calling ‘soccer’ over here) teams. If you lose one of them, the other three are more than ready to take over. Interesting side note on the financing aspect – because football has a global audience, it can tap a larger pool of funding than American sports in general. Maybe time to embrace cricket? 😉
September 27, 2011 at 5:04 pm
Steve
I think Hausman was a consultant to the Bulls when they wanted to build a new arena (what became the United Center) early in the 90s.
June 21, 2012 at 7:46 pm
Bipin Sekhon
I feel your shame. I never had any good luck with this kind of thing, either.
So glad to find out I am not by myself!
June 18, 2015 at 4:43 am
รับจำนำ iphone
Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon everyday.
It will always be exciting to read articles from other authors and use something from other websites.