An article in the WSJ describes an escalating conflict between American Airlines and intermediaries selling tickets to consumers:
In a retaliatory move against American Airlines, Sabre Holdings Corp., a middleman for many carriers’ seats, said it is raising the fees it charges American to distribute its fare information and sell its seats through thousands of travel agents….The jab follows efforts by American, the third-largest U.S. airline by traffic, to sell more of its tickets directly to consumers, a strategy designed to cut costs and give the airline more opportunities to court customers.
Getting rid of middlemen can increase surplus and efficiency. Getting rid of realtors or car salesmen eliminates the surplus they capture and hence increases the surplus left for buyer and sellers for houses and increases trade. This is the famous “double marginalization” problem as both the realtor/carsalesman and the seller charge a margin and eliminating the middleman eliminates one margin and one negative externality and increases trade. And who cries for the middleman if he loses out?
But the airline story has a different dimension: Expedia, Orbitz etc. allow easy comparison shopping. With consumers comparing prices, in a fragmented airline market, one firm or the other will undercut its competitors to make sales. This kind of thing will ensure prices are close to costs. But now, consumers will have to go to the AA website to see the prices and will find it harder to comparison shop. With positive search costs, prices can rise. The Diamond paradox is an extreme example of this. So, I guess I agree with Expedia:
Expedia lashed out at American last weekend for trying to replace the distribution model with the direct-connect network that American has developed in recent years to hook up directly with travel agencies. It called American’s push “anti-consumer” and “anti-choice,” arguing costs would jump for travel agents and there would be less pricing transparency for consumers.
If this is right, consumers will lose in the war between Expedia and AA if other airlines follow suit and ditch the intermediaries.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 10, 2011 at 2:49 pm
ryan
sure search costs rise. how much time does it take to type ‘aa.com’ into a separate tab on your web browser? southwest is a pioneer of exclusive direct ticketing, and they are one of the most consistently low-cost airlines out there. If American thinks that this move will help them increase ticket prices, I think they’re wrong. Customers will only bother checking a separate web site if there’s a reasonable chance the prices are competitive with the ones in front of their face. maybe the rise in search costs in non-negligible, but is it larger than the per-ticket fee charged by expedia?
January 11, 2011 at 1:26 am
MMP
the elephant in the room that somehow no-one mentioned is the Google-ITA merger. i suspect a lot of what’s going on here is positioning going in to that merger if it goes through. I doubt AA has the sophistication to understand Diamond’s paradox (since AA originally founded Sabre, I’d say this is true by revealed preference).
January 13, 2011 at 2:26 pm
Pete S.
I fly from Phoenix to Austin every March and have always flown Southwest since they have always been the cheapest. This year, AA was cheaper by $60. Even if I have to check a bag on AA ($25 each way), I still come out ahead.
But yeah, I agree with Ryan. Hopefully, AA becomes more competitive from this move.
January 19, 2011 at 9:23 am
North American Airlines and The Harakiri Complex « A Spoonful of Win
[…] shoot-yourself-in-the-foot move. To academic economists, this was a cunning ploy to use the Diamond paradox in their favor. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in the […]
January 20, 2011 at 7:45 pm
shrink links
…