James Surowiecki of the New Yorker describes and analyzes a price war for Stephen King:
Wal-Mart began by marking down the prices of ten best-sellers—including the new Stephen King and the upcoming Sarah Palin—to ten bucks. When Amazon, predictably, matched that price, Wal-Mart went to nine dollars, and, when Amazon matched again, Wal-Mart went to $8.99, at which point Amazon rested. (Target, too, jumped in, leading Wal-Mart to drop to $8.98.) Since wholesale book prices are traditionally around fifty per cent off the cover price, and these books are now marked down sixty per cent or more, Amazon and Wal-Mart are surely losing money every time they sell one of the discounted titles. The more they sell, the less they make. That doesn’t sound like good business.
We have a few answers to avoid this. But if tell you, I have to redo large chunks of my class…..

2 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 7, 2009 at 6:46 am
When is a price war not a price war? When it’s a loss-leader « bill | petti
[…] (Via Cheap Talk) […]
March 9, 2010 at 1:12 am
Rajib
A price-war doesn’t help anyone. The winner looses and the looser dies!