Economists have often wondered why people tip. We have lots of sophisticated explanations for why rational (i.e. selfish) people pretend to be altruistic. A leading explanation, the reputation model, relies on some repeated game concern but how would that apply in a one shot waiter game? The puzzle is, of course, easily resolved if one allows homo economicus to have a heart. Warm, mushy feelings for waiters can easily explain tipping, even if you both know your relationship is the restaurant equivalent of the one night stand.
As our well-educated and well-read readers know, the heart is a complicated thing and often responds to incentives in odd ways. Larry David is the dark Jane Austen of our cynical time and his (second!) magnum opus, Curb Your Enthusiasm, is the warped Sense and Sensibility. I enjoyed the Seinfeld non-Reunion episode. There were so many treasures in one half hour but the business lunch between Larry and Jason Alexander was my favorite bit. Larry and Alexander go dutch and Larry suggests they coordinate the tip. He wishes to avoid the embarrassment of under-tipping. It is just obvious to Larry that other people’s opinion matters so he must tip. Note it is not morality but image and hence self-image that guide Larry. He certainly does not want to tip low when his Dutch partner tips high. But if your partner tips low, there is still an incentive to tip high, because it is quite natural that you want your image to be better than your partner’s. In other words, there is a dominant strategy to tip high…a Prisoner’s Dilemma of tipping. Once we open up the heart of homo economicus, not only is there an incentive to tip, but to overtip. No wonder Larry wants to collude and coordinate tips.
How does it all work out? I don’t want to give any more away than I already have. I’ll let you watch the episode and enjoy it for yourself.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 5, 2009 at 10:44 pm
Sean
Tipping doesn’t require a warm heart or reputation concerns, it’s a social contract. Most people know that a waiter’s take-home pay is comprised almost entirely of tips. It is understood when you sit down at a restaurant that you owe the waiter a tip (how much is conditional on quality of service). If you don’t, you are effectively stealing. Tipping is governed more by moral obligation than altruism.
October 5, 2009 at 11:16 pm
Carlos
It may be also that the cited behavior is conditioned by income of the “tippers.”
If you’ve been living on a student stipend for so much time it’s likely that something a bit different may have happened. When I go to a place to meet with another person in similar condition (that is, student with stipend) it has happened to me that I don’t want to give low tip, but neither want to overtip. The image condition happens to be modified: if your tip is good and fair, you’re signaling that you care about justice and the waiter getting what she or he deserves. If your tip is low, you might be seen as a cheap and mean person. If you overtip, then you’re doing more than what is necessary. You’re not taking care of your scarce resources and then you’re seen as a bit dumb (and then you get the “stop complaining of lack of money! you give your stipend away every time you go for dinner!”).
October 7, 2009 at 11:23 am
Kirk Nelson
i was coordinating a tip with a friend once. “How much are you tipping?” “20”, he said. I thought he meant something other than what he intended. Huge overtipping as a result………….
November 6, 2009 at 12:44 am
“Tip Coordination” « GraTRUEities™
[…] Posted by gratrueities on November 6, 2009 Do you believe in ‘tip coordination’ or going your own way? In the first Seinfeld reunion episode of Curb Your Enthusiam, Larry David shares with Jason Alexander his feelings on this very subject. What is ‘tip coordination’ you may ask? Basically, it is an agreement, when splitting a bill equally, that all will tip the same amount – price fixing, if you wish! Here is an interesting commentary on the subject from the blog cheeptalk.wordpress.com: […]
March 9, 2011 at 1:09 pm
re: The Auditors » Blog Archive » Birds On A Wire: How Do The Firms Get The Word Out?
[…] managed loosely, provincial, non-passport carrying, self-serving, self-interested, smug, bad tippers who don’t care about anyone or anything not directly related to their annual draw. I was giving […]
August 21, 2011 at 7:20 am
Anonymous
I love going to the restaurants with bunch of overtippers because I tell them to give me the cash and I pay the exact bill which means that everyone at the table subsidizes my meal cost.