The world is divided into creators and collectors. Creators have the ability to conjure up inspiration and bring something new into the world. There are not many creators. The rest of us can be collectors.
Fortunately for us the world creates things for us and we get to experience them. That’s a beautiful life by itself, but for those of us who want to be creative, it also provides us with a diverse supply of themes, ideas, examples, scenarios, characters… that we can put into our collections. Then we can categorize, analyze, and recombine them into something that is just as uniquely our own as the brand new things that creators create.
Pharmaceutical research is a great analogy. There are two ways to create a new physical substance for some purpose. The first is to focus on the purpose and devote resources to try to synthesize something new. The second is to gather articles existing in nature and see what they do and how they work and try to utilize them in a new way.
The second approach is easier because you are just collecting stuff that already exists. Plus, the stuff in nature is certain to be better than what can be created now because it has been under development for eternity. On the other hand, collecting is less focused on any one purpose. What you wind up with is just what you find. The best you can do is direct your search.
(Incidentally, arguments for enviornmental conservation based on genetic diversity translate to arguments for cultural conservation to preserve memetic diversity.)
To be a good collector you decide on themes you are interested in and have some feel for. Then you keep these themes in your mind and you go around your life always looking for specimens that fit your themes. And you write them down. (I email myself.) It is a life of constant awareness, of intense passivity.
How many of us could write great novels? Almost none of us could sit down now and create a novel. But all of us have many years left to collect that novel and write it when the collection is complete. Decide today what your novel is about.

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 28, 2009 at 12:53 pm
rbhui
I consider myself not a bad collector, but do you think it’s possible to become a creator? How could one do that?
July 29, 2009 at 2:19 am
jeff
I wish I knew. I am busy collecting ideas on that subject.
July 29, 2009 at 3:15 pm
rbhui
Actually, this is kind of a curious issue the more I think about it. What keeps popping into my mind is the stance (forwarded by, for instance, Jared Diamond) that true creation is exceedingly rare, and that most is simply recombination of others’ ideas. Where is the dividing line between recombination leading to a new idea and ‘true creation’–or something that is effectively true creation? Even great novelists are (hu)m@n, and no man is an island.
Was Paul Samuelson a creator or a collector? He gave us a new perspective on economics, but it was still related to previous work.
July 28, 2009 at 1:05 pm
donna
We are all creators, even if only of our own lives…
August 1, 2009 at 12:34 pm
jeff
apropos this discussion, here is a wonderful article on writing that makes it pretty clear why you can’t learn to be a creator.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200908/tim-obrien-essay/4
March 9, 2011 at 3:13 pm
Page Numbers Are For Wussies « Cheap Talk
[…] just a page counter. You begged for your time-marking crutch and Amazon obliged. Your loss, my novel goes back in the […]