I haven’t spent enough time in Paris to sample Michelin recommended restaurants. When I lived in London, I didn’t have the income to go to Marco Pierre White’s Michelin-starred temple to gastronomy. Finally, my hard-earned graft has left me with a little bit of disposable income over mortgage and other expenses. And I am living near a city which was been noticed by the rotund Michelin Man. Living vicariously through the Dining section of the NYT, I always wondered whether the gripes I read about the Michelin Guide were justified. Now I can finally weigh in as they have released their list of Bib Gourmand restaurants for Chicago.
Bib Gourmand appears to mean restaurants where you can have two courses and a glass of wine or dessert for $40 or less. What is not clear whether such restaurants can also qualify for the higher ranking of one to three stars. I assume they cannot because that’s the only way I can rationalize what’s on the list: Frontera Grill, Lula Cafe on the same list as the pancake place, Anne Sather?!! La Creperie, gimme a break, is just crap. My wife and I almost walked out of Veerasway it was so bad.
Part of the problem is that the gradation of categories is too coarse. Just like the top B and the bottom B in an undergrad economics class, a lot of successes and sins are hidden in one lump. If this Chicago list is anything to go by, the Robert Parker 0-100 numerical approach to wine and the Zagat approach to restaurants may be better.

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 11, 2010 at 11:05 am
ryan
hey sandeep,
bib gourmand restaurants aren’t eligible for stars, meaning rick bayless was probably pretty disappointed to see the bib gourmand designation. same with publican(!) exec paul kahan. The Michelin folks called Chicago the best city in the world for breakfast, which I think accounts for Ann Sather, M Henry, etc. Ann Sather is pretty amazing, to be fair. Their cinnamon buns? ridiculous! Haven’t been to Veerasway, but Cumin, at least, is delicious.
I think I like the coarse gradations. For starters, unlike a bottle of wine, there are a ton of variables in a dining experience that a michelin reviewer can’t guarantee for the reader. Sure, you might eat the wine with an especially appropiate dish, let it sit open for a hair too long, etc., but none of that comes close to trying to predict the experience of someone at a restaurant with dozens of changing menu items, a kitchen and service staff prone to turnover, and so on.
I’m not giving the Michelin guides a pass, but I do think that there’s something to be said for coarse gradations and all the fanfare that comes with the unveiling. It’s fun, for one, to have a chance to talk about restos you’ve been to or learn about places you now feel like you have to try (Han 202, for example, is now part of my quest to find actual good chinese food in this town). So yeah, maybe Frontera got shafted, but Ann Sather is a special place, and you disagree with two spots based on your lone experiences at them. You mean to tell me you haven’t disagreed with two out of 45 zagat reviews in your life?
November 11, 2010 at 9:15 pm
ryan
to clarify, i mean that winning a bib gourmand means you didn’t win a star. you could have, but didn’t.
November 11, 2010 at 2:33 pm
Donald A. Coffin
What amazes me is how few of those places I’ve been (and I’ve lived in and around Chicago since 1984). I can say that West Town is a wonderful place for dinner, though.