Via the Times:
Amazon has been pushing publishers to sign a new round of legal agreements that would guarantee that the Kindle price for their content is always the same or lower than the price on other electronic reading devices, such as the iPad or the Sony Reader. The clause, a variation of a legal concept known as “most favored nation,” would guarantee that Amazon’s customers would always get the best price for electronic versions of magazines, newspapers and books.
If publishers accept Amazon’s contract, what impact does it have on prices of books purchased for the iPad or the Sony Reader? In the existing regime, if Apple negotiates low prices for books, it can undercut Kindle prices for the same books. This makes the iPad more attractive vs the Kindle and stimulates sales of the iPad and profits for Apple. In the new regime (i.e. if publishers accept Amazon’s terms), Apple can no longer undercut Kindle book prices as any price cut they negotiate is automatically passed on to Kindle consumers. Apple has less incentive to negotiate low prices with publishers and publishers have more incentive not to give in. An eBook price war is less likely with Amazon’s policy and consumers are going to see less competition on this dimension not more.
Publishers are complaining that Kindle book prices are too low. They are presumably worried that the Amazon deal is bad for them. But I suggest it is actually good if current prices are really too low as they claim. So they should sign it.
Is it good for Amazon? Higher prices for eBooks will slow down adoption of eReaders. But if prices of eBooks increase and their revenue sharing agreement is generous, there may be more revenue from sales of content. So the net effect depends on how much money Amazon will make off hardware versus the slice of revenue they’ll get from sales of content. And it’s not at all clear that this goes the right way for Amazon. If it goes the wrong way, in a bid to sell more Kindles, the obvious strategy is to cut the price of hardware. Then, the publishers will be even happier they signed the contract with Amazon!
This is one possible scenario. With an industry and technology that is changing rapidly, there are many others. Still, did Amazon think through all this? It’s hard for an outsider to gauge. Iran has recently moved nuclear fuel to an overground facility, within easy reach of Israeli bombs. The theories for Iran’s counterintuitive strategic move range from the “wow, they’re so sneaky and strategic” to the “duh, they did what?!”. Interpretations of Amazon’s move fall into same categories.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 1, 2010 at 1:45 am
ANON
A MFN clause doesn’t cut both ways… just because a publisher agrees to give Amazon the lowest price it offers any other company doesn’t mean that Amazon has to charge the lowest price that it offers to any other company. Amazon can charge less than Apple all year round, and then if Apple has a ‘sale’, Amazon just gets the benefit. I don’t see how this is a positive for anyone other than Amazon (and I should note that I would like to see Kindle succeed as a reader far far more than the ipad, which I think is a bit lame as a reader).
March 1, 2010 at 7:05 am
sandeep
Consider an equilibrium w/o MFN. Now suppose Amazon introduces MFN. Apple’s incentive to cut book prices is LOWER after Amazon’s MFN than before. (As you say if Apple has a sale, Amazon gets the benefit. Knowing this, there is LESS incentive for Apple to have a sale). This makes it possible to sustain an equilibrium with higher book prices after MFN. Under the old regime, Apple would have undercut Amazon. But now it does not as it doesn’t get as many extra sales from a price cut.
March 1, 2010 at 8:41 am
ANON
Hmmm. I see what you’re saying, but this is a bit messier, for at least two reasons that come to mind. First Amazon is more likely to be the company that is pushing to reduce prices, and second is the proprietary nature of the kindle and ipad stores, which means that there will probably be relatively few customers who actively use both kindles and ipads and that lower prices on one wouldn’t really make that much of a difference for users – are you going to decide to buy a machine for hundreds of dollars on the basis that you can save 2 buck per book?
March 1, 2010 at 9:36 am
sandeep
1. My analysis does not rely on symmetry between Amazon and Apple.
2. The point if whether you get an iPad or Kindle at all depends on expected prices for books. If they’re $2 higher/book that’s a disincentive to buy either piece of hardware in the first place.
March 6, 2010 at 11:54 am
The Garmin Golflogix GPS Unit : Golf Beginners Guide
[…] What does Amazon Kindle’s “Lowest Price” Policy Mean for e-Reader Sales? « C… […]