Toyota is undertaking a massive recall of vehicles to fix accelerator pedals. Obviously, Toyota’s reputation has taken a huge hit. How are their incentives aligned with consumers in terms of fixing the problem?
At a fundamental level, Toyota has a huge incentive to make sure that they solve any problems in cars on the road and in dealerships and that there are no problems in cars they make in the future. If they put in a claimed fix to the problem and it’s not a real fix and there is an accident, their reputation takes another huge hit. The people who worked at AIG and caused the problems can find other jobs because they are still nameless to consumers. But Toyota’ brand name is its reputation and if that goes, suddenly G.M. has a future after all.
There are some conflicts of interest though between consumers and Toyota. Toyota have two fixes to the pedal problem. One is to just put in a new pedal. The second is to add a steel bar to the bottom of the pedal to stop it sticking to the spring.
To the average consumer, a new pedal sounds better than the patched up old one. And it also sounds more expensive suggesting that Toyota is following a quick and dirty path to a recall with the steel bar. In an NPR interview, the Toyota CEO said both fixes cost roughly the same amount. But this does not convince non-experts, especially when Toyota has been so slow to react to the problems. So, it seems Toyota should go with the new pedal solution for everyone. Why aren’t they doing that?
This is where some conflict of interest appears: the steel bars can be produced more quickly than the new pedals. Toyota would like to get the cars on the road fixed as soon as possible to avoid another crash. So, it has decided to go for a fix which is fast but looks suspicious. This is the problem.
It has to try to make the solution as “above-the-board” as possible. Perhaps announce that anyone who got the steel bar can get the new pedal later in the year if they are not happy. If Toyota really believes the steel bar fix is as good as a new pedal, it should give away something free and valuable to make the solution credible and to say “we are sorry”. People wanting the new pedal should not get the freebie.
Not sure what the freebie should be..how about a discount on your next Toyota purchase? It should explicitly say that it can be added to any other discounts offered in the future so people know they are definitely getting a good deal

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 4, 2010 at 5:09 am
Ryan
I realize this is not the main thrust of your post, but I have to point out that I’m not sure consumers will value a “discount on your next Toyota purchase” (as long as we are talking about cars and not accessories) of a value anywhere near as low as the cost difference in the two pedals fixes, even if it can be combined with other offers–and I do not necessarily think they should. Buying a car is for most people a fairly rare event, so a lot of time would pass and new factors would enter before they’d potentially be able to use the coupon which may affect whether to even buy a Toyota again. They’re probably not enthusiastic about thinking about buying a new Toyota anyway.
February 4, 2010 at 5:59 am
sandeep
Thanks, Ryan. Yes, I was trying to think quickly of a “costly signal” Toyota can send to gain credibility and also add to its bootm line in the future. But an iPad or just plain cash would do as well.
February 4, 2010 at 6:29 am
shrik314
Toyota’s possibly losing even more credibility by insisting it’s a mechanical problem when it evidently is a bug in their software.
February 4, 2010 at 1:32 pm
Toyota's Crisis Communication - Hiding Doesn't Work | Matt Eventoff
[…] what seems like a lifetime ago in terms of media cycles, and every day, this crisis brings more and more news, none of which is […]
February 8, 2010 at 3:06 am
Piyush
Toyota certainly is going through a bad patch. It was not too long ago that after years of playing catch up, they had finaly overtaken the US auto makers for the # 1 selling Auto brand in America. And now this problem hits them hard. Japaneze “zero-defect manufacturing ” image shattered. Not only it is a $2B + hit to their bottom line, it could severely joepardize their entire Brand positioning if the recall spreads to more models or worst still, the recalls fail to be as foolproof as Toyota would want them to be. They have to get a 100% success on this and then start winning the customer confidence back again. Incentives like say a $1000 voucher (stackable with other incentives) towards their next Toyota purchase would be a step in the right direction for those looking to buy a new vehicle. For the larger population, who may not be looking for an upgrade, a simple thing like “Free oil change/maintenance for the next 3 years” would help re-establishing trust towards an Auto brand with zero-liability maintennce free image.